What could a writer do with this source?" was created by Kristin M. Woodward/Kate L. Ganski
Analyze the strength and credibility of the arguments in any source you use.
Points to Consider
Accuracy |
Is the information accurate when checked against other sources? |
Authority |
Is it clear who is sponsoring the web page? Is the sponsor legitimate? |
Content |
What is the purpose of the web page, i.e. to inform, convince, or sell? |
Coverage |
Does the site cover the subject adequately? |
Currency |
Is the publication date clearly stated? |
Documentation |
Does the author explain where the information was obtained? |
How to Tell the Difference Between Scholarly Work and Propaganda
Indicators of Scholarship |
Indicators of Propaganda |
Describes limits of research or data. |
Excessive claims of certainty, i.e. one "right" way of thinking. |
Presents accurate description of alternate viewpoints. |
Relies on personal attacks and ridicule. |
Encourages debate, discussion, and criticism. |
Emotional appeals. Use of inflammatory language. |
Settles disputes by use of generally accepted criteria for evaluating data. |
Suppresses contradictory views. |
Looks for counter-examples. |
Appeals to popular prejudices. |
Updates information. |
Devalues critical appraisal. |
Admits own ignorance. |
Transforms words and statistics to suit purpose. |
Relies on critical thinking skills |
Presents information and views out of context. |
Sources Bodi, Sonia. "Scholarship or Propaganda: How Can Librarians Help Undergraduates Tell the Difference?" Journal of Academic Librarianship 21 (1995): 21-25. Grassian, Esther. "Thinking Critically about World Wide Web Resources." Jacobson, Trudi, and Laura Cohen. "Evaluating Internet Resources." Tate, Marsha, and Jan Alexander. "Teaching Critical Evaluation Skills for World Wide Web Resources." Computers in Libraries 16.10 (1996): 49-55. |
Originally developed by Karen Lutgens, General Reference and Documents Librarian
http://www.mlb.ilstu.edu/ressubj/subject/intrnt/evaluate.htm